Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Chapter 7 BPR
I am left with questions after reading Janet Allen's example of how we can use vocab instruction to increase content knowledge. The example assignment titled The Poop on Poop made me question whether the student would really delve into a discussion about the words or rather look in the back of the text book or dictionary to find the word and quickly finish the assignment. How could we structure an assignment like that so that students would be engaged in a discussion over vocabulary words? I also like the idea of the graphic organizer but that could consume a great deal of instruction time in order to get through it. Could you pretest for vocabulary words related to the unit you are teaching and then have students create graphic organizers over the vocabulary words that most students didn't know?
Monday, June 18, 2007
Chapter 15 BPR
As I was reading this chapter(p.237) I asked myself the question, Are we in the business to provide immediate gratification for students and does this prepare them for life? I feel like that we as a society rely too much on instant gratification. The current upswing in bankruptcies in the United States is an example. Too many people wanted to buy too many expensive houses and they didn't want to wait for them. We also see people with more debt than ever before. Are these traceable to our values that we instill in our kids in school?
Friday, June 15, 2007
Chapter 10 BPR
In this chapter Jim Burke discussed using the internet to have open threaded discussions. I like this idea because he said it was designed to compliment the instruction in the class. He used an example of this when he talked about summer reading. Burke stated that the transcript from this discussion was over forty pages long. That is amazing! As a teacher I think this idea is good because when I lead discussions I spend a great deal of time probing. By being able to read a transcript I can cut my probing time down because I know the hot spots of the discussions. In fact, a teacher could use the transcript to guide much of the discussion regarding an issue.
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
NCLB and Literacy (Chapter 1)
In the first chapter of the book Adolescent Literacy, Beers attacks No Child Left Behind saying that the program does not take into consideration various backgrounds of children. The example of Derek shows how students can really work to improve their ability, and still not be considered "adequate" in the eyes of the federal government. However, the government faces a double edged sword. For example in the business world if you don't make the sale you don't make the sale, it doesn't matter how hard you tried. That mentality is what the federal government must deal with when speaking to its constituency. Furthermore, everybody wants better schools, but most don't want to pay higher taxes. While I believe that there should be better means to help children, I am not against setting benchmarks for children's success.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)